Heroes with Tarnished Halos November 20, 2007
Posted by markdykeman in heroes.Tags: m. scott peck, the road less traveled, human, heroes, halos, flaws
trackback
Can someone still be your hero when you find out they are a flawed human being like you?
In the interest of disclosure, I wish to assure you all that I don’t have a halo, nor do I expect canonization, beatification, or sainthood after I leave this world behind in 2469 (that’s my personal stretch goal for longevity - 500 years old… :) ) I’m just another flawed human being with my good and bad points. But, like many other people, I’m always on the lookout for a hero, whether I encounter them in books, on television, in comic books, or in real life. I look for role models and over the years I found some significant role models in comic books. In fact, I took second place in an oratorical contest in Grade Six with a speech on the subject of heroes. (I personally think that the winner got first place because she was a pretty girl, but who knows? Oops, there’s a couple of my flaws right there: jealousy and paranoia). I didn’t speak again for five years, but I digress…
Back to heroes: one of my favorite books of all time is The Road Less Traveled by the late M. Scott Peck (personal website and Wikipedia entry). This book was given to me during one of the low points of my life and it was a revelation. It talked about love, discipline, delayment of gratification, as so on. You’ve got to hand it to a guy who can start a book with the sentence, “Life is hard,” and then keep you from getting discouraged. His approach in that book is the antithesis of the modern day “quick fix” - instead, he writes that the good things in life require work and discipline and love provides the energy we need to keep going.
Peck’s book helped me dig out of a hole and move on to much bigger and better things. This was over a dozen years ago and plenty of things, both good and bad, have happened since then. However, Peck’s book still remains a source of inspiration to me.
A few days ago,while poking around a Squidoo lens that I had created about The Road Less Traveled, I revisited Peck’s Wikipedia entry. For the first time I checked some of the references in the entry and discovered a couple of disturbing articles about the author:
Gin, cigarettes, women: I’m a prophet, not a saint
Pop psychiatrist who ignored his bestselling advice on adultery
My kneejerk reaction was to delete the lens. This information, which had been there all along, certainly tarnished Peck’s halo in my eyes. It seemed like Peck was talking the talk without walking the walk, as the saying goes, which diminished his authority as a guru or mentor.
After having had a day or two to consider and reflect, I’ve concluded that I may be judging Peck too harshly. Granted, he comes across as being a bit of a hypocrite, particularly since he seems to have converted to Christianity during his years as an author, yet he probably broke a few of the Ten Commandments (as many of us have) at that time and for years afterward.
The thing is, despite whatever transgressions he may have committed, he eventually did confess to them. I’ll have to assume that whatever happened as consequences were matters handled between himself and his friends and family. Although his first marriage ended, he did remarry, which might have made him happy. He had a combination of Parkinson’s disease and cancer upon his death in 2005 - that was probably no picnic.
Ultimately, The Road Less Traveled, like any good book, has to have a life of its own beyond its author. I still believe this one does. It’s a shame that Peck couldn’t live up to the standards that he espoused in his books, but in the end he was human like the rest of us. He gave love and received love. He caused pain and received pain. Most importantly, he wrote about things that resonated with many other people and that has done some good in this world.
We’ve seen examples of popular, likeable people who’ve had falls from grace (Bill Clinton; other politicians; many Hollywood stars; athletes; business leaders; and the list goes on). Today’s sage is tomorrow’s hack. Fame can have a very short shelf life. Your worshippers can turn into your biggest critics within seconds. However, it might be best to divorce the person from their work so their work can survive on its own. Most of the time it’s probably not a good idea to judge a man or a woman for their transgressions (although it’s pretty hard to let Adolph Hitler off the hook, nein?), their mistakes, or flaws.
I’m going to conclude with a minor personal anecdote. As many of you Facebookers out there will know, there’s a spot in your personal profile to describe your religious views. Like many other people, this is a topic that I struggle with on a regular basis, mainly because new ideas and insights continually influence my thoughts and feelings on religion. After changing this section about twenty times, I settled upon a phrase that seems to work for me for the time being:
“Worship the message, not the messenger.”
Scott Peck was no saint, but he did describe some powerful ideas. No matter who or what he was as a person, as an author he did make a positive difference in many people’s lives. My views on his book haven’t changed much since I learned more about his life. Who knows, maybe he was trying to straighten himself out by writing his books? As a flawed human being, I can appreciate that and I can still admire his message. Maybe if we’ve been transgressed against or let down by other people, maybe we need to remember the good things that they did and let those memories live on. We can always use a little more light in this world, even if it does come from a slightly tarnished halo.









Obviously, this is a cry for the need of a hero. I’m sort of busy right now and not accepting anymore applications but since I like you, I will be your hero until you can find someone who has more time for you. You’re welcome!
Leave it to Mimzie….
What a great post! In a way, I think we’d all like to believe that somewhere out there, an infallible hero does exist. But I guess it’s not about them being perfect, but being a sort of visionary for the hope that we may be looking for at that time…(as your post reflects)
I think HEROES are better when ‘flawed’ like US.
It makes them even more powerful (at least in my eyes).
Truman Capote is my hero…and went on to die from alcohol abuse. If thats not ‘flawed’ I don’t know what is.
@ bamboo blitz - nice way of putting it
@ meleah - yes, excellent point. Kurt Cobain was also a hero to many as and he met a violent end. There are many other examples out there of flawed, tragic heroes (Hamlet, anyone?). Piers Anthony expressed a similar sentiment concerning the flawed nature of heroes or role models in his “Incarnations of Immortality” series when talking about deities. He seemed to be arguing that a “perfect” deity would be so absorbed with their own goodness and perfection that they would lose track of their “people”, mainly because they could no longer tolerate or understand human nature. At the same time, a “perfect” hero, role model or deity that we can’t understand or live up to is hard to identify with.
Piers Anthony….oh how I loved loved loved those books.
Our flaws give us the humility to keep us from thinking we are better then others during our “shinier” more heroic moments. Yes. Indeed.
Excellent post Mark!
Hey Rowan, glad you stopped by!
Great post Mark, I don’t personally worship people, but I have my heroes because they have achieved something I strive for. It could be something minor but nonetheless they have succeeded where I have yet to.
Heroes with flaws are so much more human though, don’t you agree.
@ Monika - yeah, it’s nice to have a hero that you can identify with, someone who needs clean underwear and deodorant just like us.